Delhi High Court takes suo motu cognisance of Rohini Court shootout

“This court wants valuable suggestions from respondents for security at all court complexes in Delhi,” said the Chief Justice.

The Delhi High Court on Thursday took suo motu cognisance of the Rohini court shootout that left three dead and said there was a need for proper and effective deployment of a sufficient number of police personnel in courts.

A Bench of Chief Justice D. N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh issued notice to the Delhi Police, Delhi government, and Central government as well as the Delhi High Court Bar Association and directed that suggestions in the form of an affidavit or a report be filed on the issue of maintaining security at courts.

Also read | ‘Shooting in court felt like a terror attack’

“We have taken suo motu cognisance of the incident which took place in Rohini court. This court wants valuable suggestions from respondents for security at all court complexes in Delhi,” said the Chief Justice.

The Bench said that there was a need for a fool-proof entry system in courts, installation of metal detectors, under vehicle surveillance system, and proper training of police personnel.

Jailed gangster Jitendra Gogi and his two assailants posing as lawyers were killed inside the Rohini courtroom on September 24 in a dramatic shootout that also saw the police fire bullets in retaliation, the officials had said.

Video footage of the incident showed policemen and lawyers rushing out in panic as gunshots rang out inside courtroom number 207.

The two gunmen dressed as lawyers are suspected to be members of rival Tillu gang, an official had said, adding that over 30 shots were fired.

Lawyers abstain from work a day after shootout at Rohini court

On September 24, Chief Justice of India N. V. Ramana had expressed deep concern over the shootout inside the crowded Rohini courtroom and spoke to the Delhi High Court Chief Justice in this regard and advised him to talk to both police and the Bar to ensure that the functioning of the court is not affected. The matter would be heard next on October 5.

Source: Read Full Article